# Download Algebraic Geometry. Proc. conf. Ann Arbor, 1981 by I. Dolgachev PDF By I. Dolgachev

Similar geometry and topology books

The Geometry of Time (Physics Textbook)

An outline of the geometry of space-time with all of the questions and matters defined with no the necessity for formulation. As such, the writer exhibits that this is often certainly geometry, with real structures general from Euclidean geometry, and which permit certain demonstrations and proofs. The formal arithmetic in the back of those structures is supplied within the appendices.

Additional info for Algebraic Geometry. Proc. conf. Ann Arbor, 1981

Example text

P → P¯ : E(Qp ) → E(F We shall define a filtration E(Qp ) ⊃ E 0 (Qp ) ⊃ E 1 (Qp ) ⊃ · · · ⊃ E n (Qp ) ⊃ · · · and identify the quotients. First, define E 0 (Qp ) = {P | P¯ is nonsingular}. It is a subgroup because, as we observed on p26, a line through two nonsingular points on a cubic (or tangent to a nonsingular point), will meet the cubic again at a nonsingular point. Write E¯ ns for E¯ \ {any singular point}. The reduction map P → P¯ : E 0 (Qp ) → E¯ ns (Fp ) is a homomorphism, and we define E 1 (Qp ) be its kernel.

For any elliptic curve E over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic zero, E(k)n is a free Z/nZ-module of rank 2. Proof. There will exist an algebraically closed subfield k0 of finite transcendance degree over Q such that E arises from a curve E0 over k0 . Now k0 can be embedded into C, and so we can apply the next lemma (twice). 19. Let E be an elliptic curve over an algebraically closed field k, and let Ω be an algebraically closed field containing k. Then the map E(k) → E(Ω) induces an isomorphism on the torsion subgroups.

3 27 3 27 a = 2cd + ELLIPTIC CURVES 37 ´ron Models 9. Ne Consider an elliptic curve over Qp E : Y 2 Z = X 3 + aXZ 2 + bZ 3 , a, b ∈ Qp , ∆ = 4a3 + 27b2 = 0. After making a change of variables X → X/c2 , Y → Y /c3 , Z → Z, we can suppose that a, b ∈ Zp and ordp (∆) is minimal. We can think of E as defining a curve over Zp , which will be the best “model” of E over Zp among plane projective curves when p = 2, 3. However, when p = 2 or 3 we may be able to get a better model of E over Zp by allowing a more complicated equation.